Although Plato wrote fairly well, most philosophical writing is extraordinarily bad. Philosophers like to say their awful writing results from their burrowing very deeply into very difficult waters; on the other hand, it is quite likely they are lost in the dark. (Yes, my mixed metaphor is all wet.)  

These thoughts were inspired by doing a web search for “existential dilemma.” Even for philosophical writing, articles and books about existentialism are extraordinarily turgid and unreadable. When you get right down to it, “Life’s a bitch; then you die,” sums up existential thinking well enough to at least get you three elective credits on your philosophy 101 mid-term exam.

The phrase I quote above is like a tiny, freeze-dried kernel of existential thinking. If you add liquid (Cherry Vile is an appropriate choice) it expands. Sometimes it expands just a little bit.

 

For example, I found an extremely disorganized and incoherent web site that sounds as if it was compiled by as a class project by some philosophy students taking philosophy 201. Although they’ve gone downhill from the tag I posted above, they still maintain some clarity and focus.

The Existential system of beliefs is very simple – nothing comes after death. We simply cease to be. This creates what is known as the Existential dilemma. That is, our life becomes absurd and meaningless without an afterlife to strive toward. In fact, many believe that the genesis of contemporary religion can be found in the desire for purpose. Thus, the Existential person must try to find meaning in a life that is essentially meaningless and without end culmination.

This web site is almost as bad (meaning it is even worse):

Sometimes adding an entire bottle of Cherry Vile to the tags it expands into the complete writing of Kierkegaard, a man who wrote a variety of works, all of which bear the same title: Abandon All Hope, Ye Who Enter Here. Then add a little Sartre, and you create a concoction so stupifyingly dreadful that it earns you a doctorate in philosophy as well as a gag superglued over your mouth for the rest of your life.

6 Responses to “RG’s Day at the Zoo with Cherry Vile Prep (Part 3)”

  1. Pauline Says:

    We supposedly learned about existentialism in an honors English class I took in 12th grade (in which we read and analyzed works of literature and discussed the philosophy behind them as well as doing literary analysis). I found some of the literature very interesting, but I never was quite sure what existentialism really was.

    I took three philosophy classes in college and loved them. I wished I had had time in my schedule for more, especially the course in logic. Intro to Philosophy gave us (appropriately) an introduction to epistemology (as well as to ethics, philosophy of religion, logic, and I forget what the other branches are).

    As I remember (which might be somewhat faulty, after 26 years), the sources of knowledge are authority, empirical observations, reason, and personal experience, with the possible addition of direct apprehension of knowledge (mysticism).

    As we were at a Christian college, the Bible was added as a category all by itself, over all other sources. I always had some trouble with that, as it seems to me that people based their belief in the Bible as an infallible source of knowledge on a combination of authority (church teaching), reason, personal experience, and often a dose of mysticism (I just *know* it’s true).

    Some parts of the ethics class were a bit turgid, but on the whole it was very educational. My favorite was philosophy of religion, where we discussed issues such as divine sovereignty vs free will, and the “problem of evil.” I did my term paper showing that all the traditional answers to the problem of evil are inadequate. Not that I had a better answer, I just said we don’t know and we have to trust God. Somewhat to my surprise, I got an A.

    If I could find a good (i.e. non-turgid) book on epistemology, I’d love to study is some more.

  2. modestypress Says:

    Pauline, I had to look up the meaning of “epistemology.”

    I hope you write a non-turgid book on the topic. I pledge myself to buy and read it.

  3. modestypress Says:

    Also, your comment is pertinent to my next post.

  4. truce Says:

    I wish I could find a link to the Monty Python sketch of the Philosophers…

    I’ve often thought that a good way to sum up Existentialism is to say “We exist. That’s all: nothing more, but certainly nothing less. There is no point towards which our existence leads, other than ceasing to exist. Deal with it.”

    I like that, I find it comforting. If we’re not meant to be achieving anything then we can’t really beat ourselves up for failing, can we?


  5. And yet we do — so maybe the basis of existentialism is an untruth. :)

  6. modestypress Says:

    As I will relate when I eventually get to my story someday, Random Granddaughter is wrestling with big questions, even at the age of four. By the time she is five she will probably say, “Grandpa, what is existentialism? Do I want to study it in kindergarten?”

    She is already learning how to dial mommy’s cell phone to call Grandma and Grandpa from the ferry. By next year, she will probably be able to use Skype and set up a conference call. I will suggest she talk to Trucie in Australia (she has already been studying continents in preschool) and to Fluffy. I just got a comment on an older blog post in Russian, so I may need to throw Russia in there as well. I will let you explain it all to RG on the phone.

    RG will have her own blog by the age of six.


Leave a Reply